Technology

Broadly defined "technology" e.g. software, water pumps

cross pieces for bracing

cross pieces for bracing

the final product: recycled wood becomes counter space for my kitchen

the final product: recycled wood becomes counter space for my kitchen

The final product. A new counter next to the stove.

drilling holes to make the screws slide in so nice

drilling holes to make the screws slide in so nice

Pre-drilling the wholes for the screws makes it less likely that the wood will split.

lefotver wood from my fence

lefotver wood from my fence

This is some wood leftover from replacing my fence. Great fodder for home projects.

Is Adobe Air the New Java? Bringing bloated and slow cross-platform capabilities to the web-age

Is Adobe Air the New Java?  Bringing bloated and slow cross-platform capabilities to the web-age

This image shows the memory usage (resident and virtual) for a variety of applications on my machine.

  • Firefox sits at the top (it's been open for a few days with thousands of tabs opened/closed each day)
  • In position 2 and 3 are Mac Operating System processes like the kernal and the WindowServer.
  • Eclipse (Java based, fairly complex application with 3 PHP Projects with several megabytes of code are all "Open").
  • TweetDeck - posts content to a webservice. Gets content from a webservice. Consumes a shit-ton of memory. Written as an Adobe Air application.
  • Safari (native Mac application that I use only lightly)
  • OpenOffice.org! Really! Less memory hungry than these other applications
  • Thunderbird - Based on the same code as Firefox...I use it for 7 e-mail accounts, and yet it's not all that memory hungry apparently...

I also used Twhirl for a while - it had memory usage similar to Tweetdeck. Which brings me to my conclusion:

Java is famous for being a slow/bloated (you can argue that's not true, but it is famous for it). Now that Java is old news and AIR/Silverlight/Prism are the new HOT - Is Adobe AIR going to be the next cross-platform bloated/slow language that we grudgingly use?

Broadcast Music Around Your House - Apple Airport Express? Roku? Squeezebox?

Here's the scenario: all of our music is stored as mp3s. We want to be able to control music from a laptop as we sit in our kitchen or back room and have that music broadcast to speakers all over the house and back yard patio. Ideally we'd rather not have to run speaker wires from a central amplifier to the rest of the house. There seem to be 3 or four solutions to this problem.

Apple Airport Express and iTunes

Now that we're a family of Mac users, this seems like a decent solution. We buy a handful of Airport Express units ($100 new or as low as $60 used/refurbished) and install them in a power outlet near the speakers. The speakers have to have their own amplifier and accept a headphone mini-jack input for this to work. I'm also not 100% sure that the airports would all be synchronized in terms of what they play at the same time, though there are multiple articles which claim that it is possible. So, it probably works ;)

Bonus: Each of the airport express units expands the coverage of the WiFi network as well which will make our house super strong...and perhaps we could sell access to that to neighbors...

Drawbacks: iTunes only.

A Dedicated Device like Roku or Squeezebox

Roku and Squeezebox are two alternatives focused specifically on music. Roku is more focused on using the Roku to control the music, costs $200, and doesn't act as a WiFi repeater. The Squeezebox Receiver or Transporter could also do this but, like Roku, are way more expensive at $150 or $2,000 respectively and don't act as WiFi repeaters.

Drawbacks: Still requires some client software on the laptops that is Windows/Mac only :(

Remote Wireless Speakers - Audio Unlimited

Design Advice for ProsePoint's Demo

Design Advice for ProsePoint's Demo

Some advice for ProsePoint's demo to share in http://groups.drupal.org/node/16475#comment-60279

Syndicate content